first_imgRecently the Opposition People’s Progressive Party (PPP) vehemently objected to the advertised presence of several State agencies being part of a meeting held by the People’s National Congress Reform (PNCR), Georgetown District. The objection seemed only natural, given it was a planned meeting by a political entity; the ruling one. The official presence of such agencies would obviously raise concerns over party paramountcy through the process of politicisation.Such concerns are not new to those familiar with the country’s political history. They would never forget the image when the flag of the PNC flew higher than the Golden Arrowhead in the compound of the Appeal Court when that party was in Government. That firmly and unambiguously demonstrated that the party was in charge and epitomised the oppression that prevailed.While fear permeated during that period, that image served to further embed it into mindsets and ironically, as the flag fluttered, it froze many into silence. There was no mistaking that the PNC party reigned supreme and the State apparatus was made to be at its disposal. So were public servants who believably, were mandated to attend political meetings and to participate in State-sponsored events, including Mashramani.The imposed fear made it much easier for the workers to succumb to such demands since there were mouths to feed. In looking back, while it was despicable, it can be attributed to natural consequences of a dictatorship where the iron fist created soft bellies by choice. Those who opposed took tremendous risks with some tragically paid the ultimate price as the brutality took toll.In assessing history, those heinous acts may now be deemed as understandable within the context of the consequences of a dictatorship and obviously much to the displeasure of the victims. The dictatorship ended, freedom rebirthed and democracy prevailed for over two decades. Even in those freer and modern times and when the PNC was in Opposition, it created scenarios to berate the PPP Administration accusing it of being undemocratic.Those accusations were even made when the PNC engineered acts to deliberately create instability necessitating responses to ensure law and order. It used the 2015 campaign to repeat those accusation and made bold promises to “restore” democracy and the rule of law. By its own record since 2015, it would not be inaccurate to state that’s a promise it failed to deliver or even remember.Its current position in disregarding the enshrined and ensuing process of a successful no-confidence motion highlights its lack of adherence to the constitution and by extension, the rule of law.The use of State agencies at one of its meeting must therefore be seen in a particular context. Based upon Government’s campaign and the expectation it built in the minds of Guyanese, freedom of choice, democracy, transparency and adherence to the Constitution should be a norm. In the first instance, one would expect that if a State agency is embarking on an outreach to engage citizens in an effort to foster awareness about particular programmes and policies, it would be done independently of any political entity to avoid any semblance of politicisation.From their public profiles, the entities advertised seemed very capable of conducting such outreaches as part of its service provision. Based upon the advertisement in question, it may be easy for a conclusion to be made that the ruling party might have forced the participation of the said entities. The timing can also foster that belief given the Government’s noticeable efforts to engage the populace in various parts of the country suddenly after the passage of the No-confidence Motion. Within that context it would be difficult to conclude otherwise especially when such outreaches were not common before.This brings into question whether these entities freely agreed to participate or were coerced. That suggestion may not be unreasonable given that the PNC, which is now the major party in the current coalition (many are of the opinion it is the Government), when in government, was reportedly responsible for forcing public servants to participate in State events and for flying its flag in the compound of the Appeal Court.What currently plays out raises eyebrows as to whether these are signs of a repeat of that oppressive period. Analysts have pointed to other developments that could conclude a gradual return of those dark days. Most significant must be the President unilaterally appointing the Chairman of the Guyana Elections Commission (GECOM) disregarding what obtained for 27 years. The process he disregarded began with one of his party’s predecessor as President; Desmond Hoyte who was an attorney.The imposing of a plethora of crippling taxes, the seemingly unjustified firing of a number of persons, including professionals, and the accusations of political witch-hunts, further add to that belief of a growing dictatorship. The refusal to abide by the Constitution since the no-confidence vote may have removed any doubt some might have as to that ominous return. In what seems as desperation on its part to stay in office, coercing State entities in the present seems an action plucked directly from the past.last_img read more

first_img LIVING THE DREAM Tony Cascarino backs Everton to sign two strikers for Carlo Ancelotti Arsenal transfer news LIVE: Ndidi bid, targets named, Ozil is ‘skiving little git’ 3 Here’s a round up of the latest news and rumours from Wednesday’s newspapers and online… RANKED Cavani ‘agrees’ to join new club and will complete free transfer next summer Where every Premier League club needs to strengthen in January targets 3 3 targets LATEST Kevin De Bruyne ‘loves Man City and wants to keep winning’, reveals father IN DEMAND The biggest market value losers in 2019, including Bale and ex-Liverpool star Lopetegui was controversially binned off as Spain manager in the week leading up to the summer’s World Cup after he accepted the Real Madrid job – but his reign could be short-lived Kane and Mane have been tipped to leave Tottenham and Liverpool Chelsea have suffered a big blow to their transfer plans after top striker target Mauro Icardi said he has “no intention” of leaving Inter Milan. (AS)The Blues are also set to miss out on Genoa’s Polish forward Krzysztof Piatek, 23, as they search for a new striker in January. (Evening Standard)Tottenham striker Harry Kane is ready for a move to Real Madrid, according to Bayern Munich and Germany legend Lothar Matthaus. (The Sun)Liverpool forward Sadio Mane has been tipped to make a shock move to Manchester United, but Togo coach Claude Le Roy. (Daily Star)Tottenham centre-back Toby Alderweireld has revealed he would be open to a return to former club Ajax in the future. The Belgian defender was linked with an exit from Spurs over the summer but eventually stayed, although there are doubts over his long-term future. (De Telegraaf) Meanwhile in Spain, rumours are flying around over the future of Real Madrid manager Julen Lopetegui…Lopetegui will be sacked and 42-year-old reserve team boss Santiago Solari will be placed in interim charge for Sunday’s El Clasico against Barcelona, according to reports. (Star)However, other sources claim former Spain coach Lopetegui WILL be in charge for El Clasico. (Mundo Deportivo)Real Madrid director Emilio Butragueno has suggested Lopetegui is not in immediate danger of the sack, saying everything at the club “is totally normal”. (Daily Mail)It is claimed sacking manager Lopetegui, 52, would cost Real Madrid €18million, with former Chelsea boss Antonio Conte one of the favourites to replace him. (Sport) Man United joined by three other clubs in race for Erling Haaland Top nine Premier League free transfers of the decade Transfer gossip on REVEALED moving on Jose Mourinho has said Manchester United need to spend in the transfer market to compete at the same level as Europe’s best teams, including rivals Manchester City. (Manchester Evening News)Chelsea winger Victor Moses is considering leaving the club over his lack of regular game time since the arrival of new manager Maurizio Sarri. (Goal)Chelsea defender Marcos Alonso has reportedly penned a new four-and-a-half year contract at Stamford Bridge. (ESPN)Meanwhile, the Blues are also planning to offer Germany defender Antonio Rudiger a new contract in the region of £100,000-a-week to secure his long-term future at the London club. (Daily Mail) Latest EXCLUSIVES and transfer headlines:EXCLUSIVE – Manchester United urged to re-sign Wayne Rooney on loan from DC United in JanuaryEXCLUSIVE – Alcohol at football: EFL clubs such as Sunderland and Ipswich want the ban at stadiums scrappedEXCLUSIVE – Stuart Pearce dismisses Arsenal’s ten-game winning run – ‘The fixtures have been kind to them’Paulo Dybala’s latest tweet has got Manchester United fans very excitedChelsea transfer news: Blues send scouts to monitor AC Milan defender Alessio Romagnoli Former Arsenal boss Arsene Wenger linked with AC Milan manager’s job under Ivan Gazidislast_img read more